Stuart hall encoding and decoding essay

Decoding is all about the understanding of what someone already knows, based on the information given throughout the message being received.

He called this response as subjective, sighting that the effect of the encoded practices would only find meaning if the audience identified with the encoded message.

In contrast to other media theories that disempower audiences, Hall proposed that audience members can play an active role in decoding messages as they rely on their own social contexts, and might be capable of changing messages themselves through collective action.

The process is made complex by the introduction of the model of circuit and moments describing the stages of encoding and decoding of messages.

Encoding Decoding Theory

Decoding has both verbal and non-verbal forms of communication: Hall further explains that the meanings and messages in the Stuart hall encoding and decoding essay "production" are organized through the operation of codes within the rules of "language.

Then what is the essence of encoding it if the message must be evaluated then translated. Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry. Each moment would be reduced to codes that would have to be translated during the process of de-coding the message.

Importance of communication is based purely on the transmission model where the sender sends a message to the receiver. However, the model has loopholes in that it concentrates so much on the levels that the structures for which the messages have been encoded.

His exploration of the punk subculture outlines the potential causes and influences of the punk movement, especially for the youth. Numerous factors are involved in the production process.

Each moment has different ways and means of existence. Use distribution or consumption — For a message to be successfully "realized", "the broadcasting structures must yield encoded messages in the form of a meaningful discourse. The meaning derived in the process can be interrupted to give different view and opinion of the message.

His model is impractical for the television, as he had wanted us to believe. The audience is trying to reconstruct the idea by giving meanings to symbols and by interpreting the message as a whole. Stuart Halls seminal paper: Furthermore, Hall stresses that although texts can be understood in different ways, an unlimited number of interpretations should not be assumed.

Therefore, messages can only be considered as re-coding Stuart, In her book Reading the Romance: However, while the worker may recognize that the wage freeze is needed, they may not be willing to partake in a wage freeze since it will directly affect them rather than others [11] His example demonstrates that people may negotiate a code to work around their own beliefs and self-interests.

Theorists such as Dick Hebdige, David Morley, and Janice Radway have been heavily influenced by Hall, and applied his theory to help develop their own: If indeed the attachment of meaning in practice is essential to the final level of consumption of information, what is the point of the practices?

When you decode a message, you extract the meaning of that message in ways that make sense to you. The reasons why the original model needs to be revisited and the alternative model description to follow.

Highly political discourse emerges from these oppositional codes as "events which are normally signified and decoded in a negotiated way begin to be given an oppositional reading.

This means that there is a chance that the message will have interruptions or be incomplete. These elites created the "hegemonic interpretations"[7] Because these ideas were hegemonic interpretations, they became dominant.

If the stages are indeed autonomous and that the effect of any one of the stage does not affect the other stage how then is the message filtered. In this position the audience might accept the hegemonic viewpoint on a general level, however its meaning may be manipulated by audiences beliefs or behaviour.

These causes confusion and can even lead to legal procedures if the message is taken to mean what it does not.Encoding/decoding by Stuart Hall He discussed this model of communication in an essay entitled 'Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse,' Hall's essay offers a theoretical approach of how media messages are produced, disseminated, and interpreted.

His model claims that TV and other. Conclusion. It is clear from this analysis of Stuart Hall's theory of 'encoding/decoding', that, despite the possibility of a necessity for a deeper investigation of the subject, the argument provides a sound definition of the relationship.

Encoding and Decoding. Encoding and Decoding. The article is an analysis of the process of producing messages and disseminating them in media. The writer analyzes the four-stage theory of the process of dissemination in the process called communication.

Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse was written by Stuart Hall inwhich was critically acclaimed in mass communications research and paved the way for many academics to build upon the theoretical model of encoding and decoding between audience and receiver. The Encoding/decoding model of communication was first developed by cultural studies scholar Stuart Hall in Titled 'Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse', Hall's essay offers a theoretical approach of how media messages are produced, disseminated, and interpreted.

[1] As an important member of the Birmingham School of Cultural Studies, Hall.

Stuart Hall stated in his key paper, Encoding/Decoding, that the codes of encoding and decoding are not identical or symmetrical, but relatively autonomous.

Stuart hall encoding and decoding essay
Rated 5/5 based on 86 review