The impact of intellectual capital on firms market value essay

The Value of Intellectual Property, Intangible Assets and Goodwill

These assets may be equally valuable but more difficult to identify in terms of the earnings and profits they generate. In valuing an item of intellectual property, the search for a comparable market transaction becomes almost futile. The basis of market value is the assumption that if comparable property has fetched a certain price, then the subject property will realize a price something near to it.

The excess profits method looks at the current value of the net tangible assets employed as the benchmark The impact of intellectual capital on firms market value essay an estimated rate of return. This will quantify the shortest of the following lives: With the asset you are considering, the valuer will need to consider the operating environment of the asset to determine the potential for market revenue growth.

There are other impediments that limit the usefulness of this method, namely, special purchasers, different negotiating skills, and the distorting effects of the peaks and troughs of economic cycles.

Relief from royalty considers what the purchaser could afford, or would be willing to pay, for a licence of similar IPR. Nevertheless, the role of intellectual property rights IPRs and intangible assets in business is insufficiently understood. For example, a multiple is arrived at after assessing a brand in the light of factors such as leadership, stability, market share, internationality, trend of profitability, marketing and advertising support and protection.

For the value of intangible assets, calculating the value of intangible assets is not usually a major problem when they have been formally protected through trademarks, patents or copyright. The potential will need to be assessed by reference to the enduring nature of the asset, and its marketability, and this must subsume consideration of expenses together with an estimate of residual value or terminal value, if any.

What is their value and hence level of risk? This is not only due to lack of compatibility, but also because intellectual property is generally not developed to be sold and many sales are usually only a small part of a larger transaction and details are kept extremely confidential.

This is used to calculate the profits that are required in order to induce investors to invest into those net tangible assets.

Finding generic equivalents for a patent and identifiable price differences is far more difficult than for a retail brand. There are quasi-concepts of value which impinge upon each of these main areas, namely, investment value, liquidation value, and going concern value.

Inevitably, exploitation increases the risk assessment. The cardinal rule of commercial valuation is: This is difficult enough when valuing assets such as bricks and mortar because it is never possible to find a transaction that is exactly comparable.

With many intangibles, a very careful initial due diligence analysis needs to be undertaken together with IP lawyers and in-house accountants. These processes lead one nowhere unless due diligence and the valuation process quantifies remaining useful life and decay rates.

Gross profit differential methods are often associated with trade mark and brand valuation. The presence of an asset is a function of its ability to generate a return and the discount rate applied to that return. The methods of valuation flowing from an estimate of past and future economic benefits also referred to as the income methods can be broken down in to four limbs; 1 capitalization of historic profits, 2 gross profit differential methods, 3 excess profits methods, and 4 the relief from royalty method.

It must also be acknowledged that in many situations after examining these lives carefully, to produce cashflow forecasts, it is often not credible to forecast beyond say 4 to 5 years.

When undertaking an IPR valuation, the context is all-important, and the valuer will need to take it into consideration to assign a realistic value to the asset. Potential profits and cash flows need to be assessed carefully and then restated to present value through use of a discount rate, or rates.

It is illustrative, demonstrating the cash flow potential, or not, of the property and is highly regarded and widely used in the financial community. It recognizes that the transaction is not in the open market and that vendor and purchaser have been brought together in a legally binding manner.

At what level do I need to insure the IPR risk? Who owns it could I sue or could someone sue me?

For example, in the discounted cashflow model, it would not be correct to drive out cashflows for the entire legal length of copyright protection, which may be 70 plus years, when a valuation concerns computer software with only a short economic life span of 1 to 2 years.

In an ideal situation, an independent expert will always prefer to determine a market value by reference to comparable market transactions. DCF mathematical modelling allows for the fact that 1 Euro in your pocket today is worth more than 1 Euro next year or 1 Euro the year after.

While theoretically relying upon future economic benefits from the use of the asset, the method has difficulty in adjusting to alternative uses of the asset. The method pays little regard to the future. This process is necessary because, just like any other asset, IPRs have a varying ability to generate economic returns dependant upon these main lives.

This method recognizes market conditions, likely performance and potential, and the time value of money.

The royalty stream is then capitalized reflecting the risk and return relationship of investing in the asset. The message is that when undertaking a valuation using the discounted cashflow modelling, the valuer should never project longer than what is realistic by testing against these major lives.

However, the fact that the legal life of a patent is 20 years may be very important for valuation purposes, as often illustrated in the pharmaceutical sector with generic competitors entering the marketplace at speed to dilute a monopoly position when protection ceases. There are four main value concepts, namely, owner value, market value, fair value and tax value.

The method ignores changes in the time value of money and ignores maintenance.The review of related literature is made to study the relationship between financial performance and market capitalization. And also bridge the gap left by the earlier researchers.

The performance of a business is express by the overall profits and losses over a specified period during that time. Intellectual capital, a form of capital of growing importance, refers to intangible resources which create company value (Ashton, ) by giving the company a competitive edge (Edvinsson & Malone, ; Stewart, ).

2 Thus, both the intellectual capital concept and the business model concept concern the transformation of resources (capital. A variety of different factors can influence an organisations reputation and their performance, including: negative publicity, poor product quality, or substandard service delivery.

Therefore, it is imperative for an organisation to effectively manage all of their operations to sustain quality and. What then should change for IC and ICA to become worthwhile for firms? Echoing the Editorial published in the Critical Perspectives on Accounting (CPA) Special Issue on Critical Intellectual.

Kelvin King, founding partner of Valuation Consulting 1. Intellectual capital is recognized as the most important asset of many of the world’s largest and most powerful companies; it is the foundation for the market dominance and continuing profitability of.

and market value (the value of a public company To positively impact future value,organizations require a better understanding of intellectual capital and the latest tools available to identify, measure,and manage this important value driver.

HOW TO MANAGE YOUR INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

Download
The impact of intellectual capital on firms market value essay
Rated 5/5 based on 80 review